Best of LinkedIn: Strategy & Consulting CW 04/ 05

Show notes

We curate most relevant posts about Strategy & Consulting on LinkedIn and regularly share key takeaways.

This edition outlines strategic priorities for 2026, focusing on the shift from AI experimentation to enterprise-wide transformation, where success depends on integrating technology into the core business model rather than treating it as a side project. Business leaders are encouraged to move beyond “pilot purgatory” by rigorously auditing their portfolios and restructuring operations to accommodate new agentic workflows that deliver tangible financial returns. Beyond technology, the texts highlight a growing leadership fault line where human adaptability—not software—is the primary bottleneck, requiring a focus on human ingenuity and genuine engagement over superficial retention statistics. Concerns around employee stagnation, described as “job hugging,” point to the need for individuals to adopt corporate-style strategies for managing their own careers to avoid burnout and maintain professional relevance. Sustainability and grid resilience are positioned as essential to long-term value creation, reframing the conversation from regulatory compliance to proactive management of systemic risks and energy constraints. Ultimately, success in 2026 is defined by agility and adaptability in an era of geopolitical fragmentation, where trade barriers and cross-border restrictions compel companies to localize operations and institutionalize political intelligence.

This podcast was created via Google Notebook LM.

Show transcript

00:00:00: provided by Thomas Elguyer and Frennus, based on the most relevant LinkedIn posts about strategy and consulting from CW four and five.

00:00:08: Frennus specializes in B to B market research for strategy and consulting teams with a focus on tech and ICT.

00:00:15: Okay, so we've got a massive stack of research on the desk today.

00:00:19: And looking through these posts from the last two weeks, Honestly, it feels a little bit like the hangover after the party.

00:00:26: That

00:00:26: is the perfect way to put it.

00:00:27: You know, for the last year, LinkedIn has been this breathless echo chamber of AI is magic and everything is changing forever.

00:00:34: Right, lots of rocket ship emojis.

00:00:36: Exactly,

00:00:36: and now the lights are on, the music stopped, and well, the bill has arrived.

00:00:41: If I had to put a bumper sticker on the mood for weeks four and five, it would be, the party is over, the real work.

00:00:47: Which sounds a bit depressing, but that's actually where the money is made, right?

00:00:50: Precisely.

00:00:51: We are shifting from ambition, what we could do, to execution.

00:00:55: How do we actually govern this stuff, pay for it, and, you know, fix it?

00:00:59: We're seeing a huge pivot to financial accountability, the gritty reality of operationalizing AI, and some very, very serious geopolitical headwinds.

00:01:07: And we're going to talk about the token economy, which blew my mind, by the way.

00:01:12: We've got a potential breakup of the big four consulting firms and we need to talk about why your personal strategy is probably failing you.

00:01:19: It's a dense landscape, no doubt.

00:01:21: Let's dive in.

00:01:22: Let's start with that real work theme.

00:01:24: For so long, AI was the shiny toy for the CIO or, you know, the CTO.

00:01:29: But looking at the sources, particularly a post from Kristach Heiser at BCG, he is waiting a huge red flag here.

00:01:36: He's basically saying that area is over.

00:01:39: It's completely dead.

00:01:40: Weiser's point is that AI has graduated.

00:01:44: It's no longer just a tech initiative.

00:01:46: It is now a core pillar of corporate strategy.

00:01:48: And that means the leadership of AI is moving decisively to the CEO.

00:01:53: Which

00:01:53: makes sense in theory, but practically CEOs are already swamped.

00:01:56: Can they actually own this?

00:01:57: They have to.

00:01:58: They have to own it because the differentiator is no longer who is experimenting.

00:02:01: Everyone is running a pilot program somewhere.

00:02:03: The real winner is the company that scales with discipline.

00:02:06: And you just can't scale across silos, across marketing, supply chain, HR without a mandate from the very top.

00:02:12: But Mike Evans raised a counterpoint that I thought was really sharp.

00:02:16: He argues that ownership right now is a complete mess.

00:02:19: You've got the CIO, the CDO, the CTO.

00:02:22: It's like a game of musical chairs.

00:02:24: Right.

00:02:24: And when everyone owns it, nobody owns it.

00:02:27: Evan suggests we might see the rise of a chief AI transformation officer.

00:02:32: Someone whose sole job is to bridge that gap between the technical ambition and the business reality.

00:02:38: Because right now, those two things are just not talking to each other.

00:02:42: Speaking of that gap, I have to bring up this analogy from Valentino Koster.

00:02:46: I think this explains why so many boards are frustrated.

00:02:48: The

00:02:48: orchestra analogy?

00:02:49: Yes.

00:02:50: He says, everyone bought into AI expecting a symphony.

00:02:53: They thought they'd flip a switch and have this fully formed orchestra playing perfect harmony.

00:02:57: And instead?

00:02:58: Instead they got a guy with a tuba.

00:02:59: Right.

00:02:59: They got one strong instrument.

00:03:01: Maybe it's a great chatbot or a great coding assistant, but it is not a symphony.

00:03:06: And the natural reaction is disappointment.

00:03:09: Yeah, you know, you fired up the program expecting Beethoven and you got a solo.

00:03:13: But Coaster's advice is don't fire the tuba player because he isn't an orchestra.

00:03:18: That's such a crucial mindset shift.

00:03:20: You have to build the section first.

00:03:21: You start with the one use case, the one player, and you perfect that before you try to conduct the whole show.

00:03:27: It's about patience and execution, which is... pretty rare these days.

00:03:31: And it connects to the infrastructure question too.

00:03:33: Vikas Ghul had a very sharp analysis of the Apple and Google Gemini partnership.

00:03:38: Oh,

00:03:38: this is the debate about tracks versus rails.

00:03:40: Okay.

00:03:41: Break that down for me, because to me, tracks and rails, they sound like the same thing.

00:03:45: So

00:03:45: think of the tracks as the heavy infrastructure, the massive foundational models, the billions of dollars in data centers.

00:03:53: That's becoming a public utility.

00:03:55: Goal argues that for most companies, trying to build your own track, your own foundational brain, is just an unjustifiable expense.

00:04:03: So don't build your own LLM from scratch.

00:04:05: Exactly.

00:04:06: The value is in the rails.

00:04:07: The rails are the user experience, the sensors, the customer.

00:04:11: That's where Apple lives.

00:04:12: The advice is to focus on the experience layer, not the plumbing.

00:04:16: But, and there's always a but, you can't build a great experience on a shaky foundation.

00:04:22: So Rashidi had a post that really resonated.

00:04:25: She argues that companies are buying furniture before building the house.

00:04:29: That is a classic problem in digital transformation, but it's just so much worse with AI.

00:04:35: So the furniture is the flashy AI use case.

00:04:38: the chatbot.

00:04:38: Right.

00:04:39: Look at our cool generative design tool.

00:04:41: But the

00:04:42: house,

00:04:43: the data architecture underneath is a mess.

00:04:46: Full of termites.

00:04:47: Exactly.

00:04:47: The data is siloed.

00:04:49: It's dirty.

00:04:49: It's unstructured.

00:04:50: So you buy this expensive furniture, you put it on a rotting floor, and then you wonder why the initiative collapses.

00:04:56: Rashidi is saying, stop buying furniture.

00:04:58: Fix the floor.

00:05:00: And even if the floor is solid, the people walking on it might not be ready.

00:05:04: Kabil Beraja shared some takeaways from Davos, and he noted that the bottleneck isn't the technology anymore.

00:05:09: It's speed and talent adaptation.

00:05:11: We are just moving faster than our people can learn, and that leaves to friction.

00:05:15: Which is a perfect segue to the economics of all this.

00:05:18: Because if we are scaling, we need to know what it costs.

00:05:21: And this is where it gets really interesting.

00:05:23: We are seeing a whole new economic unit emerge.

00:05:26: The token.

00:05:27: Right.

00:05:27: Stuart Scott is from Deloitte is calling the token the new unit of economic value.

00:05:32: It's a fundamental shift.

00:05:34: We really need to understand this.

00:05:36: The last twenty years we've lived in the sauce era.

00:05:39: you pay a flat fee per user say fifty bucks a month for a seat and that person can use the software as much as they want.

00:05:46: It's predictable.

00:05:47: It's a buffer.

00:05:48: The CFO knows exactly what the bill will be in December.

00:05:50: Exactly.

00:05:51: But AI is moving us to a consumption model.

00:05:54: You pay for the compute.

00:05:55: You pay per token generated.

00:05:57: It's like your water bill or your electric bill.

00:06:00: The more you leave the tap running, the more you pay.

00:06:02: And this is where SCOTUS brings up.

00:06:04: Jeven's Paradox.

00:06:05: Can we just unpack that for a second?

00:06:07: Because it sounds really counterintuitive.

00:06:09: It is.

00:06:09: Jeven's Paradox is an economic theory from the nineteenth century.

00:06:13: It was originally about coal.

00:06:14: That says, as technology becomes more efficient and cheaper, you don't actually save resources, you end up consuming

00:06:20: more.

00:06:21: Because it's cheaper, so you just stop worrying about using it.

00:06:24: Precisely.

00:06:25: Think about LED light bulbs.

00:06:26: They're incredibly efficient compared to the old incandescent bulbs.

00:06:30: Did our electricity bills go down?

00:06:32: No.

00:06:32: We just started putting lights everywhere.

00:06:34: So as AI gets cheaper per token, we aren't going to save budget.

00:06:38: We're just going to inject AI into every single email, report, and meeting.

00:06:42: And the bill will skyrocket.

00:06:44: That is what is keeping CFOs up at night, because suddenly your IT cost isn't fixed.

00:06:49: It's variable, and it can scale infinitely.

00:06:52: Evan Benjamin asked the million dollar question.

00:06:55: Is there such a thing as predictable AI ROI?

00:06:58: I'm guessing the answer is not yet.

00:07:00: It's difficult.

00:07:01: Benjamin highlights the need for AI fine ops.

00:07:04: You need a dedicated function just to track cost per million tokens.

00:07:08: You have to ensure that every dollar spent actually translates to business impact.

00:07:12: And Nicholas Fundrini took that even higher, right?

00:07:15: to the board level.

00:07:16: Yes.

00:07:16: So Andrea argues that fine ops isn't just about operational cost control anymore.

00:07:20: It's about economic governance and strategic risk.

00:07:24: Strategic

00:07:25: risk.

00:07:25: Think about it.

00:07:26: If your operational costs are variable based on how chatty your AI agent is, that is a board level risk issue.

00:07:33: If an agent goes rogue and starts having million token conversations with customers, you could blow your quarterly budget in a week.

00:07:40: Wow.

00:07:41: It's wild to think that a chatty agent could be a budget risk.

00:07:45: Okay, but let's pivot to the people running these budgets.

00:07:48: theme three is about the human element Because with all this automation people are asking so what is my job now?

00:07:55: Neha Cabra shared some really striking data from McKinsey.

00:07:59: They found that two-thirds of U.S.

00:08:00: work hours require non-physical capabilities.

00:08:03: Those are exactly the hours ripe for AI agents.

00:08:06: That

00:08:06: sounds terrifying.

00:08:07: Two-thirds.

00:08:08: That's basically the entire white-collar workforce.

00:08:10: It does sound scary, but Cabra asks the so-what question.

00:08:13: If the AI does the processing, what stays stubbornly human?

00:08:16: And her answer is trust.

00:08:18: judgment, escalation, care, and orchestration.

00:08:21: The

00:08:21: human backbone.

00:08:22: That's it.

00:08:22: The AI can generate the report, but a human has to decide if it's true, if it matters, and who needs to see it.

00:08:28: That judgment layer becomes more valuable, not less.

00:08:31: But you have to pivot your skills toward it.

00:08:33: I think this connects to a post by Reshma Ramachandran that I absolutely loved.

00:08:37: She flipped the script.

00:08:38: She said companies spend billions on strategy market signals, positioning portfolios, but individuals.

00:08:45: We rarely have a strategy for our own lives.

00:08:48: That is such a powerful insight.

00:08:49: Most people just drift.

00:08:50: They take the next job that comes along.

00:08:52: And she advises treating your life like an organization.

00:08:56: What is your product?

00:08:57: How diversified is your portfolio?

00:09:00: If you lose your main client, your employer, Do you have a backup plan?

00:09:05: It's about viewing yourself as a business of one.

00:09:07: And Maidiz Derivik added a really practical note to that, specifically about job searching.

00:09:12: He says burnout comes from a lack of strategy, not just effort.

00:09:15: Oh, the sprinting into a brick wall feeling.

00:09:18: Precisely.

00:09:18: You see candidates sending out hundreds of applications.

00:09:21: That's effort.

00:09:23: But if you don't have feedback loops, if you don't know why you aren't getting hired, you just keep trying harder at the wrong thing.

00:09:29: That's a failure of personal strategy.

00:09:31: So don't just work hard.

00:09:32: Optimize.

00:09:33: Build a feedback loop.

00:09:35: Exactly.

00:09:36: And even for those who have jobs, Mark D. Orlick warns leaders not to get complacent.

00:09:41: He says low turnover does not equal engagement.

00:09:44: Right.

00:09:44: Just because nobody is quitting doesn't mean everyone is happy.

00:09:47: That's the paralysis factor.

00:09:49: People might stay because the market is tough, not because they're inspired.

00:09:53: The risk isn't the person who leaves, it's the person who stays but has stopped caring.

00:09:57: That zombie workforce can just kill a company's execution speed.

00:10:01: That is a silent killer.

00:10:04: Okay, zooming out from the individual to a global stage, we really can't ignore the geopolitical landscape.

00:10:10: It feels like every week there's a new complication.

00:10:12: It's the age of competition, as Shoaib Yusuf from BCG calls it.

00:10:16: He argues that geopolitics is no longer just a backdrop.

00:10:19: It's not something you watch on the news.

00:10:20: It has to be a core corporate capability.

00:10:23: A muscle you have to build.

00:10:24: Yes,

00:10:25: you need to be able to sense and interpret these shifts.

00:10:28: Andreas Pireschek mentioned the WEF global risks report, twenty twenty six.

00:10:32: And the takeaway there is that compliance is no longer just defensive.

00:10:35: It's a strategic asset for stability.

00:10:38: And there's a specific blind spot that Christian A. Rodriguez Schiffel pointed out that scared me a little bit.

00:10:44: Everyone is watching tariffs on goods, steel, cars, that sort of thing.

00:10:48: Right.

00:10:48: The physical stuff we can see on a container ship.

00:10:51: But he says the bigger threat is restrictions on cross-border services.

00:10:54: This is huge for the digital economy.

00:10:56: We are seeing data localization rules and market access limits growing twice as fast as trade restrictions on goods.

00:11:04: Can you give me a concrete example?

00:11:05: Who does this hurt?

00:11:06: Well, imagine you are a global bank or a massive HR consultancy.

00:11:12: You run a centralized model where your data sits in the cloud in the US, but you serve clients in Europe and Asia.

00:11:19: Suddenly, a new regulation says German data cannot leave Germany.

00:11:23: And your entire centralized business model just breaks.

00:11:27: Oh, overnight.

00:11:28: Exactly.

00:11:28: You have to duplicate your infrastructure, duplicate your data governance.

00:11:32: It becomes incredibly expensive and complex.

00:11:34: If you aren't watching services trade restrictions, you are just flying blind.

00:11:39: Speaking of business models breaking, let's talk about the consulting industry itself.

00:11:44: James O'Dowd dropped a bit of a bombshell prediction regarding the Big Four.

00:11:48: Yes, the potential separation of audit and consulting.

00:11:51: We've heard rumors of this for years.

00:11:53: Why does O'Dowd think it's actually inevitable now?

00:11:57: His reasoning is quite sound.

00:11:59: He argues they are essentially incompatible operating systems.

00:12:03: I mean, think about it.

00:12:04: What is the job of an auditor?

00:12:06: Verification, safety, saying no.

00:12:08: Exactly.

00:12:09: Audit requires restriction.

00:12:11: You have to be conservative.

00:12:12: You have to minimize risk.

00:12:13: Now, what does a strategy consultant do?

00:12:15: They sell, yes, they sell innovation, speed, taking risks.

00:12:19: Right.

00:12:19: Audit sells trust, consulting sells optionality.

00:12:23: Odoud argues that trying to house those two mindsets under one roof and under one conflict of interest policy is becoming impossible.

00:12:31: So the separation isn't a retreat, though.

00:12:32: No.

00:12:33: Odoud says it's a refocus for survival.

00:12:35: Audit becomes simpler and safer.

00:12:37: Consulting becomes faster and more meritocratic.

00:12:39: It allows both sides to actually do their jobs.

00:12:42: It'll be fascinating to see if that happens.

00:12:44: Okay, moving on to our final theme.

00:12:46: Sustainability, energy, and ESG.

00:12:49: And this is another area where optics are giving way to strategy.

00:12:53: Calm Divine noted that sustainability is moving from being a PR exercise to the strategic backbone of value creation.

00:13:01: But Patrick Schmucky had a critique of how we report on this.

00:13:05: He says current reporting describes programs well.

00:13:07: Look at our nice solar panels, but it's terrible at describing fragility.

00:13:11: That's the systemic risk.

00:13:13: You can have a great sustainability report and still be incredibly vulnerable to a supply chain shock or a climate event.

00:13:20: We just aren't measuring resilience well enough yet.

00:13:23: In talking about resilience, we have to talk about the grid.

00:13:26: Because all those tokens we talked about earlier, they run on electricity.

00:13:29: A

00:13:29: lot of electricity.

00:13:30: Joseph Nogle had some insights from PowerGen, in twenty twenty six, connecting AI to energy.

00:13:35: He is a metaphor I loved.

00:13:36: He said we're trying to fit a gallon of water into a pint glass.

00:13:39: The gallon is the AI power demand.

00:13:41: The pint glass is our current grid capacity.

00:13:44: So what do we do?

00:13:44: Do we just stop building data centers?

00:13:46: We can't.

00:13:47: The demand is exploding.

00:13:49: Nogel suggests the solution isn't one magic technology.

00:13:52: It involves hyperscale data centers, next-gen nuclear and sodium ion batteries.

00:13:57: We need it all.

00:13:58: It's in all of the above strategy.

00:14:00: It

00:14:00: has to be, and I liked his framing.

00:14:01: Extraordinary loads is extraordinary opportunity.

00:14:04: This is forcing an industrialization of our infrastructure at a speed we haven't seen in decades.

00:14:09: It's terrifying, but it's also a huge investment boom.

00:14:13: So... Bringing this all together.

00:14:15: We've covered a huge amount of ground from the CEO's office to the power grid from the token economy to our own resumes.

00:14:22: if you had to pull one thread that connects all of this, what would it be?

00:14:26: If I connect the dots, the theme is really about discipline.

00:14:29: Whether it's Sol Rashidi telling you to fix your data foundation before buying AI furniture, or Maid Distarovich telling you to have a strategy for your job search, or the energy sector facing the physics of the grid.

00:14:40: The

00:14:40: height is over.

00:14:41: The era of move fast and break things seems to be transitioning into move intentionally and build things that last.

00:14:47: It's about governance, resilience, and owning the outcome, not just the ambition.

00:14:52: I love that.

00:14:52: Move intentionally and build things at last.

00:14:54: That's a great note to end on.

00:14:56: If you enjoyed this episode, new episodes drop every two weeks.

00:14:59: Also check out our other editions on Private Equity, Venture Capital, and M&A.

00:15:04: Thanks for listening and don't forget to subscribe.

New comment

Your name or nickname, will be shown publicly
At least 10 characters long
By submitting your comment you agree that the content of the field "Name or nickname" will be stored and shown publicly next to your comment. Using your real name is optional.